1980 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1952 Holden FX

To start off, 1980 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (101 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1952 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Chrysler 1609 (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Chrysler 1609 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Chrysler 1609 1952 Holden FX
Make Chrysler Holden
Model 1609 FX
Year Released 1980 1952
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1812 cc 2166 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 51 HP
Torque 144 Nm 136 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 970 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 4380 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2620 mm