1980 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 99 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Because 1980 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Chevrolet Rezzo | |
Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
Model | Thunderbird | Rezzo |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 119 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1381 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |