1980 Mazda 929 vs. 1963 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Zodiac (108 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Zodiac should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Zodiac weights approximately 200 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Zodiac (191 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Ford Zodiac will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Mazda 929 | 1963 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | 929 | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1769 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1270 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
