1980 Opel Ascona vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 965 kg more than 1980 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Opel Ascona | 2010 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Opel | Cadillac |
Model | Ascona | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1980 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2880 mm |