1980 Renault 20 vs. 2006 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Renault 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Renault 20 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Falcon weights approximately 393 kg more than 1980 Renault 20.
Because 2006 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1980 Renault 20 has manual transmission. 1980 Renault 20 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Renault 20 | 2006 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | 20 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1647 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2930 mm |
