1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2011 Chevrolet Colorado
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1101 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Colorado.
Because 2011 Chevrolet Colorado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Colorado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2011 Chevrolet Colorado | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Chevrolet |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6749 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2206 kg | 1105 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3210 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 72 L |
