1980 Suzuki LJ 50 vs. 2012 Holden Caprice
To start off, 2012 Holden Caprice is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Caprice (278 HP) has 252 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50.
Because 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Caprice (350 Nm) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki LJ 50. 2012 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 has manual transmission. 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Suzuki LJ 50 | 2012 Holden Caprice | |
| Make | Suzuki | Holden |
| Model | LJ 50 | Caprice |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 537 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 52 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
