1980 Toyota Celica vs. 2012 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 701 kg more than 1980 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2012 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Toyota Celica | 2012 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | Toyota | Lincoln |
| Model | Celica | MKS |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 3700 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1182 kg | 1883 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5184 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1928 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1565 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2868 mm |
