1980 Volvo 66 vs. 2004 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2004 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 2004 ZAZ Slavuta.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 ZAZ Slavuta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Volvo 66 | 2004 ZAZ Slavuta | |
| Make | Volvo | ZAZ |
| Model | 66 | Slavuta |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1287 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1590 mm |
