1981 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1964 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 3,524 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 540 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1964 Pontiac Tempest is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Pontiac Tempest. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Mitsubishi Colt | 1964 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Pontiac |
Model | Colt | Tempest |
Year Released | 1981 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1244 cc | 3524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2930 mm |