1981 Zastava 102 vs. 1970 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Zastava 1300 (53 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Zastava 1300 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Zastava 102 | 1970 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 102 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2430 mm |
