1982 Audi 100 vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 100 would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1982 Audi 100. (85 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 360 kg more than 1982 Audi 100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (220 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Audi 100. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Audi 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Audi 100 | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 100 | Outlander |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2374 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.5 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 100 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 59 L |
