1982 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Eagle Vision
To start off, 2004 Eagle Vision is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,698 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Eagle Vision (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1982 Audi 80. (130 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1982 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Eagle Vision weights approximately 380 kg more than 1982 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Audi 80 | 2004 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Audi | Eagle |
Model | 80 | Vision |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |