1982 Austin Allegro vs. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis
To start off, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis (209 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1982 Austin Allegro. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis should accelerate faster than 1982 Austin Allegro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis weights approximately 915 kg more than 1982 Austin Allegro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 1995 Mercury Grand Marquis | |
Make | Austin | Mercury |
Model | Allegro | Grand Marquis |
Year Released | 1982 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 1715 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3200 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1980 mm |