1982 Austin Allegro vs. 2003 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2003 MCC ForTwo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Allegro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Allegro would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Austin Allegro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Austin Allegro weights approximately 120 kg more than 2003 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2003 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Austin Allegro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Allegro | 2003 MCC ForTwo | |
Make | Austin | MCC |
Model | Allegro | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 49 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1810 mm |