1982 Austin Princess vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Austin Princess would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 685 kg more than 1982 Austin Princess.
Because 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Austin Princess | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Princess | Captiva |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1700 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 1845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2710 mm |