1982 BMW 316 vs. 2004 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 BMW 316 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1982 BMW 316. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1982 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 BMW 316 | 2004 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 316 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1573 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3510 mm |