1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (101 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 310 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Buick | Zastava |
| Model | Skyhawk | 102 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |
