1982 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2004 Volvo S60
To start off, 2004 Volvo S60 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S60 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S60 weights approximately 539 kg more than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Buick Skyhawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Buick Skyhawk | 2004 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | S60 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1625 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
