1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1978 Seat 133
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Seat 133 would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (163 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1978 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1978 Seat 133.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Seat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Seat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 1978 Seat 133 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
| Model | Camaro | 133 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4995 cc | 841 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 163 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 54 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2030 mm |
