1982 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2004 Mazda B3000 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda B3000 (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda B3000 (244 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | B3000 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2474 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3200 mm |
