1982 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2003 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 395 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2003 Lotec C 1000 has manual transmission. 2003 Lotec C 1000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chevrolet Malibu | 2003 Lotec C 1000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotec |
Model | Malibu | C 1000 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3790 cc | 5499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 843 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1150 mm |