1982 Chrysler E vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1982 Chrysler E is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (160 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (228 Nm). This means 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | E | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 3344 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 160 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4840 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2670 mm |
