1982 Chrysler E vs. 1991 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1991 Lotus Elan is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 186 kg more than 1991 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 1991 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | E | Elan |
Year Released | 1982 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2260 mm |