1982 Chrysler E vs. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146
To start off, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 (142 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 weights approximately 9 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146. (169 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Alfa Romeo 146.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2000 Alfa Romeo 146 | |
Make | Chrysler | Alfa Romeo |
Model | E | 146 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2550 mm |