1982 Chrysler E vs. 2004 Volvo S40
To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,524 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2004 Volvo S40. (138 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 154 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo S40. (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo S40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Chrysler E | 2004 Volvo S40 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | E | S40 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2524 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 228 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1399 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2800 mm |
