1982 Chrysler E vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chrysler E (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chrysler E should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Chrysler E weights approximately 210 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (192 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | E | Clio |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2570 mm |