1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Cadillac DTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac DTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac DTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Cadillac DTS (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Cadillac DTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac DTS weights approximately 612 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Cadillac DTS (400 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chrysler E. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Cadillac DTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chrysler E.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Cadillac DTS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | E | DTS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1818 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5273 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1463 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2936 mm |