1982 Chrysler E vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | E | Compass |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2634 mm |