1982 Chrysler E vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chrysler E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chrysler E would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Chrysler E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DART (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Chrysler E. (141 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DART should accelerate faster than 1982 Chrysler E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DART weights approximately 194 kg more than 1982 Chrysler E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chrysler E (228 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Dodge DART. (197 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1982 Chrysler E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Dodge DART.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Chrysler E | 2013 Dodge DART | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | E | DART |
Year Released | 1982 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 197 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4672 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2703 mm |