1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2005 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2005 Samsung SM3 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Samsung SM3 (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 26 kg more than 2005 Samsung SM3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2005 Samsung SM3 | |
| Make | Dodge | Samsung |
| Model | 600 | SM3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1164 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2540 mm |
