1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (172 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Compass weights approximately 238 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (223 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | 600 | Compass |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 223 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1428 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2634 mm |