1982 Ford Falcon vs. 1954 Riley RM A
To start off, 1982 Ford Falcon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 135 kg more than 1954 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Falcon | 1954 Riley RM A | |
Make | Ford | Riley |
Model | Falcon | RM A |
Year Released | 1982 | 1954 |
Engine Size | 3271 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2870 mm |