1982 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Because 1982 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Ford Falcon | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Falcon | CR-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3271 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2619 mm |