1982 Jaguar XJR vs. 2010 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2010 Dodge Dakota is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1982 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1637 kg more than 1982 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2010 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Jaguar XJR | 2010 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | Jaguar | Dodge |
| Model | XJR | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5343 cc | 3701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2537 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 83 L |
