1982 Lada S vs. 2008 MG ZR
To start off, 2008 MG ZR is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 MG ZR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZR weights approximately 95 kg more than 1982 Lada S.
Because 1982 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 MG ZR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Lada S | 2008 MG ZR | |
Make | Lada | MG |
Model | S | ZR |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |