1982 Mercedes-Benz T vs. 2008 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Volvo C70 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercedes-Benz T would be higher. At 2,520 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo C70 weights approximately 242 kg more than 1982 Mercedes-Benz T.
Because 1982 Mercedes-Benz T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mercedes-Benz T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mercedes-Benz T has manual transmission. 1982 Mercedes-Benz T will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mercedes-Benz T | 2008 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Volvo |
| Model | T | C70 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2307 cc | 2520 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2650 mm |
