1982 Mitsubishi Celeste vs. 1984 Renault 25
To start off, 1984 Renault 25 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Renault 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Renault 25 weights approximately 291 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | 1984 Renault 25 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Celeste | 25 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2068 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1236 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4160 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2730 mm |
