1982 Mitsubishi Sigma vs. 2011 Audi A6
To start off, 2011 Audi A6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi A6 (178 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma.
Because 2011 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma has manual transmission. 1982 Mitsubishi Sigma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Mitsubishi Sigma | 2011 Audi A6 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Audi |
Model | Sigma | A6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 178 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2833 mm |