1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1961 Volvo 220
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Volvo 220 (74 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Volvo 220 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1961 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1961 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1961 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Pulsar | 220 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2610 mm |
