1982 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Nissan Pulsar weights approximately 320 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1982 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Nissan Pulsar | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Pulsar | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 96 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 865 kg | 545 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2040 mm |
