1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2011 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 847 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2011 Chevrolet Traverse | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cutlass | Traverse |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 2173 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5207 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1991 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3020 mm |
