1982 Skoda L vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Skoda L would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1982 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1982 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 675 kg more than 1982 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Holden UTE (305 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Skoda L. (74 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Skoda L | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Skoda | Holden |
Model | L | UTE |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1046 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2950 mm |