1982 Toyota Celica vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 400 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura CL (315 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Acura CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | Toyota | Acura |
| Model | Celica | CL |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 3210 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |
