1982 Toyota Celica vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2010 Renault Clio. (81 HP @ 3750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 5 kg more than 2010 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Toyota Celica | 2010 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Toyota | Renault |
| Model | Celica | Clio |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2563 cc | 1460 cc |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 215 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1175 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |
