1982 Zastava 102 vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 132 (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 132 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 132 weights approximately 325 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 132 (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 132 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Zastava 102 | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Zastava | Zastava |
| Model | 102 | 132 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 95 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2560 mm |
