1982 Zastava 102 vs. 2011 Audi Q5
To start off, 2011 Audi Q5 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi Q5 (211 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Audi Q5 weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi Q5 (349 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi Q5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Zastava 102 | 2011 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Zastava | Audi |
Model | 102 | Q5 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2160 mm | 2807 mm |