1983 Audi 80 vs. 1996 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1996 Jaguar XK is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (370 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 1983 Audi 80. (90 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1983 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jaguar XK weights approximately 660 kg more than 1983 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (535 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Audi 80. (147 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Audi 80 | 1996 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Audi | Jaguar |
Model | 80 | XK |
Year Released | 1983 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 535 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 75 L |