1983 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Opel Corsa
To start off, 2006 Opel Corsa is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,473 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 89 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1983 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Opel Corsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Opel Corsa. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1983 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Opel Corsa.
Compare all specifications:
1983 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Opel Corsa | |
Make | Chevrolet | Opel |
Model | Camaro | Corsa |
Year Released | 1983 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2473 cc | 1398 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |