1983 Ford Ranger vs. 1968 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1983 Ford Ranger | 1968 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Ranger | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1983 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 94 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4150 mm |
